English translation published by the NBR in its bilingual Regulations file (marked unofficial). The Arabic text published in the Official Gazette remains the legal reference in the event of any discrepancy.
The NBR may not re-examine and reassess a previously examined Tax Period unless new information, unavailable at the earlier examination and assessment, is discovered and requires reassessment.
Taxable Persons whose previously examined period is reopened and audit and dispute teams.
The earlier examination has stability but is not absolutely closed. Ask whether information is genuinely new, was unavailable earlier and actually requires reassessment.
Current text
Test reopening
- 1
Evidence earlier examination scope and outcome.
- 2
Identify alleged new information precisely.
- 3
Test whether it was available earlier.
- 4
Link it to the period and Tax.
- 5
Distinguish required reassessment from a changed view.
- 6
Keep both examination records.
Connected provisions
Regulations — Article (92)
Assessment decisionReassessment must still be issued with reasons and required contents.
Open connected ArticleLaw — Article (49)
Net Tax assessmentThe Law creates power and this Article constrains repeat examination.
Open connected ArticleOfficial guides and tools
Connected Madar tools
Invoice found after examination
A period was examined and an undisclosed sales document later appears that was unavailable and directly affects Tax. Reassessment may be triggered. Reopening merely because the same information is now viewed differently needs justification under the new-information condition.
Questions to help you apply it
- Same period previously examined?
- What new information?
- Why unavailable earlier?
- How does it require reassessment?