Article commentary and official references

Location of an entity

Article 6 — Location of a constituent entity that is a permanent establishment

Links a permanent establishment's location to its legal category and the jurisdiction granted or exercising taxing rights over its net income.

Short answer

Links a permanent establishment's location to its legal category and the jurisdiction granted or exercising taxing rights over its net income.

What should you do now?Record the establishment’s category and basis: treaty and taxing rights, net-income taxation, or the third category’s conditions. Evidence location before allocating the accounts.

Provision in brief

What does the official Article provide?

The official source is Arabic. This English commentary is explanatory and is not presented as an official translation.

Links a permanent establishment's location to its legal category and the jurisdiction granted or exercising taxing rights over its net income.

This is a verified summary rather than a verbatim reproduction. Consult the official Arabic text, the Law and later decisions before making a final determination.

Madar explanation

What does the Article mean in plain language?

This Article locates a permanent establishment after its category under Law Article 1 has been identified; it does not establish one from a business address alone. For the treaty category, use the jurisdiction that treats it as a permanent establishment and to which the treaty allocates taxing rights.

Without an applicable treaty, a place or deemed place of business taxed locally on net income similarly to residents is located in that taxing jurisdiction. In a jurisdiction without corporate income tax, the third category requires a place that would be a permanent establishment under the Model Tax Convention, with taxing rights over its income under Article 7; if that test is met, use where the establishment is situated. Match the result to the correct definition paragraph and read it with Bahrain’s rule in Law Article 5(D) and Regulations Article 4.

The main entity’s location does not automatically determine its permanent establishment’s location. Locate each before allocating income and taxes and computing the jurisdictional result; common legal identity does not by itself justify blending both in Bahrain.

Who should read this?

Dual-resident entities, permanent establishments and groups with a location change during the year.

Practical action

Record the establishment’s category and basis: treaty and taxing rights, net-income taxation, or the third category’s conditions. Evidence location before allocating the accounts.

Illustrative Madar example

How can the rule appear in practice?

A main entity resides outside Bahrain, while an applicable treaty treats its Bahrain operation as a permanent establishment and allocates Bahrain taxing rights. Under that category, the establishment is located in Bahrain without automatically relocating the main entity there.

This illustration is not an NBR case or a binding outcome for a particular fact pattern.
Common mistake to avoid

Locating every branch in the parent’s jurisdiction, or confusing whether a permanent establishment exists with where it is located.

Legislative connection

Related Articles

Limits of the commentary

Before relying on the result

Is this Article enough on its own?

Usually not. Read it with the connected Law Article, definitions, any effective election and current NBR guidance, especially for an amount or deadline.

Does NBR guidance replace the Regulations?

No. Guidance explains application and supports procedures and examples, but current legislation and decisions prevail in case of inconsistency.

References

Official sources